From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
Date: | 2006-12-29 19:49:50 |
Message-ID: | 1167421790.21290.18.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> entirely.
>
> 4) GNUTLS development seems more active? OpenSSL has been in a frozen/mature
> state for a while. I don't understand why OpenSSL is still labelled as
> 0.9.x, which might indicate alpha quality, under heavy development.
>
> I don't find the reasons too compelling - but they are points to
> consider.
5) GNUTLS does not run well under all of our supported platforms.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> mark
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Roman Kononov | 2006-12-29 19:54:41 | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing |
Previous Message | mark | 2006-12-29 19:16:05 | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |