| From: | Reece Hart <reece(at)harts(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Akbar <akbarhome(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: select union with table name |
| Date: | 2006-12-29 05:03:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1167368629.26596.3.camel@snafu.site |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 19:09 +0700, Akbar wrote:
> select blue.name from blue union select red.name from red
> give me this:
> name
> 'blabla'
> 'bubu'
> 'haha'
> 'kkk'
>
> I want this:
> name table_name
> 'blabla' blue
> 'bubu' blue
> 'haha' red
> 'kkk' red
>
> Could I?
select name,'blue' as "table_name" from blue union all select name,'red'
as "table_name" from red;
Note the 'all' after union... I suspect you'll want that or should at
least consider it.
-Reece
--
Reece Hart, http://harts.net/reece/, GPG:0x25EC91A0
./universe -G 6.672e-11 -e 1.602e-19 -protonmass 1.673e-27 -uspres bush
kernel warning: universe consuming too many resources. Killing.
universe killed due to catastrophic leadership. Try -uspres carter.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ben | 2006-12-29 07:11:47 | Re: Geographical redundancy |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-29 04:44:30 | Re: questions about migrating form postgres 7 to 8 |