From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Doug Knight" <dknight(at)wsi(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_standby and build farm |
Date: | 2006-12-28 13:40:44 |
Message-ID: | 1167313244.3633.98.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 20:09 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> The reason for the -m option was performance. Recovery is I/O-bound,
> with 50% of the CPU it does use coming from IsRecordValid() - which is
> where the CRC checking takes place. (I can add an option to recover
> without CRC checks, if anyone wants it, once I've rejigged the option
> parsing for recovery.conf.)
Make that 70% of the CPU, for long running recoveries, but the CPU only
gets as high as 20% on my tests, so still I/O bound.
> Should be able to use hard links, i.e. ln -f -s /archivepath/%f %p
> instead. I'll test that tomorrow then issue a new version.
The ln works, and helps, but not that much. I'll remove the -m option
and replace it with an -l option. Must be careful to use the -f option.
The majority of the I/O comes from writing dirty buffers, so enabling
the bgwriter during recovery would probably be more helpful.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-12-28 13:41:57 | Re: Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-12-28 12:25:10 | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |