From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: HASH_BLOBS hazards (was Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions) |
Date: | 2020-12-15 14:23:41 |
Message-ID: | 1167268.1608042221@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 01:59:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Here's a rolled-up patch that does some further documentation work
>> and gets rid of the unnecessary memset's as well.
> +1 on removing the memset() calls. That said, it's not a big deal if more
> creep in over time; it doesn't qualify as a project policy violation.
Right, that part is just neatnik-ism. Neither the calls with memset
nor the ones without are buggy.
>> + * *infoP and hash_flags should specify at least the entry sizes and key
> s/should/must/
OK; thanks for reviewing!
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Khandekar | 2020-12-15 15:04:02 | Re: Speeding up GIST index creation for tsvectors |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-12-15 14:14:25 | Re: On login trigger: take three |