| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP patch for "operator families" |
| Date: | 2006-12-27 21:36:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1167255384.3783.559.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 16:48 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> > Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
> > into "operator families", as per discussion last week. It's far from
> > ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments. What's done
> > is ...
>
> > Comments?
>
> Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress
> would be more visible?
I thought it did? Tom's marked this clearly as WIP.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Roman Kononov | 2006-12-27 21:43:49 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling of underflows, |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-12-27 21:35:33 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing |