8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE (was: [GENERAL] pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch)

From: "Matt Miller" <pgsql(at)mattmillersf(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE (was: [GENERAL] pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch)
Date: 2006-12-18 19:44:29
Message-ID: 1166471069.16068.281035729@webmail.messagingengine.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> When I apply pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch to Postgres REL8_2_STABLE I get
> a handful of rejects.

The patch applies to the 8.2.0 tarball without rejects and without
fuzz. That's good. Now on to some fun with pgcluster...

However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0. This all
raises the question: what's the difference between REL8_2_STABLE,
REL8_2_0, and the 8.2.0 tarball?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-12-18 19:54:58 Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE
Previous Message John McCawley 2006-12-18 18:57:40 Re: Creating an Independant Application

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-12-18 19:54:58 Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE
Previous Message Matthew O'Connor 2006-12-18 19:40:34 Re: Vaccuming dead rows on busy databases