Re: recovery.conf parsing problems

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <andrew(at)supernews(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recovery.conf parsing problems
Date: 2006-12-14 12:19:37
Message-ID: 1166098777.3733.78.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 17:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > OK, I would propose to extend the guc-file.l to include sufficient code
> > to allow the parsing of the conf files to be identical between the
> > postgresql.conf and the recovery.conf (it isn't the same yet).
>
> It would probably be far easier for long-term maintenance if you just
> built an independent lexer, instead of trying to make guc-file.l
> serve multiple masters.

Will do.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-12-14 12:52:05 Re: recovery.conf parsing problems
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-12-14 12:19:10 Re: pg_standby and build farm