| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [rfc] new CREATE FUNCTION (and more) |
| Date: | 2000-11-17 04:40:48 |
| Message-ID: | 11660.974436048@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Not at all. The call is, as you point out, defining the protocl for
> enquiry. Nothing more. With 7.1, the process above is sufficient. There is
> no need to call *in this version* because pg_fmgr_api_version returns
> enough information when combined with the existence of a well-defined entry
> point. Future versions would need to call the entry point, I would expect.
Well, I was planning to go ahead and call the entry point anyway, just
so that it could tell me "it's an old-style function" if it wanted to.
Not sure that'll ever happen in practice, but that case ought to work
IMHO.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Samplonius | 2000-11-17 05:00:53 | Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c) |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-11-17 04:33:42 | Re: [rfc] new CREATE FUNCTION (and more) |