| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Best <nbest(at)ci(dot)uchicago(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] \copy: unexpected response (4) |
| Date: | 2009-08-14 18:04:07 |
| Message-ID: | 11660.1250273047@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Neil Best <nbest(at)ci(dot)uchicago(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane-2 wrote:
>> You're talking like you've found this to be repeatable. Is it?
> It is indeed repeatable, Tom. I was able to perform my \copy batch job
> multiple times without error by working over the local connection. I had to
> run it many times to iteratively catch all of the type mismatches that had
> to be fixed, so I truncated and \copied over 200 tables about 7 times in
> this manner. I did not attempt any software upgrades. Any theories?
Sorry, I meant to ask whether the *failure* was repeatable.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Spinassi | 2009-08-14 18:24:13 | Re: Proxy for postgres |
| Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2009-08-14 17:41:00 | Re: Proxy for postgres |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Best | 2009-08-14 18:31:44 | Re: [HACKERS] \copy: unexpected response (4) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-08-14 16:20:44 | Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Remaining Patches |