Re: Switching to XML

On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 03:13 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 00:32 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > > > If you know of a way to create a PDF off DocBook XML in 30
> > > > > minutes, please tell us.
> > > >
> > > > See the post on this thread from :
> > > >
> > > > Guillaume Lelarge
> > > >
> > > > 10 minutes to generate a pdf.
> > >
> > > Right. So why don't we just use that?
> >
> > How about the fact that we are putting undue burden on our fellow
> > regional projects?
> >
> > How about it isn't in english?
>
> Well, I didn't actually find a post titled "10 minutes to generate a
> pdf." anywhere, so I assumed you referred to another one of his posts
> which described how they used FOP to build PDF documentation. That
> method does not burden anyone unduly and it is in English. But maybe
> we're not talking about the same thing.

I meant, *their* xml file is not english. So it doesn't do any good.
Remember this whole current thread started because we are trying to
create print ready documentation, which we currently do not have.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate