From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Switching to XML |
Date: | 2006-12-09 20:01:39 |
Message-ID: | 1165694499.25137.2.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
>
> > Hell, the only reason I have even bothered to contribute what little I
> > have to the docs is because I wrote a book in SGML, thus it is a no
> > brainer to me. Others aren't so tortured as to have done the same.
>
> I would hate to hand edit the stuff generated by something like
> OpenOffice.org.
As would I.
> >
> > The french team also uses Docbook XML and they can generate a PDF in 30
> > minutes... it takes us DAYS because of the SGML.
>
> Here I agree - 30 minutes vs days is a good reason - as long as editing
> with an ascii editor is not taken away.
I would never expect to take editing away.. I personally would likely
just use bluefish, not Openoffice.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-09 21:05:01 | Re: Switching to XML |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-09 18:32:41 | Re: Switching to XML |