| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, Brian Wipf <brian(at)clickspace(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: File Systems Compared |
| Date: | 2006-12-06 16:34:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1165422878.20753.13.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> As you suggest, database replication provides one of those features, and
> Solaris ZFS has many of the data management features found in high end SANs.
> Perhaps we can get the best of both?
>
> In the end, I think SAN vs. server storage is a religious battle.
I agree. I have many people that want to purchase a SAN because someone
told them that is what they need... Yet they can spend 20% of the cost
on two external arrays and get incredible performance...
We are seeing great numbers from the following config:
(2) HP MS 30s (loaded) dual bus
(2) HP 6402, one connected to each MSA.
The performance for the money is incredible.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> - Luke
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian Hurt | 2006-12-06 16:40:06 | Re: File Systems Compared |
| Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-12-06 16:31:01 | Re: File Systems Compared |