From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Robert Lor" <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Cc: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Dynamic Tracing docs |
Date: | 2006-12-02 12:50:08 |
Message-ID: | 1165063809.3778.987.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 09:43 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
>
> I have a question here, regarding this:
>
> To include DTrace support in a 64-bit binary, specify --enable-dtrace
> and DTRACEFLAGS="-64" to configure.
>
> The dtrace documentation says that dtrace automatically picks the right
> build environment. Something is wrong here. Either the dtrace
> documentation or ours.
I didn't presume to question Robert's technical notes
http://blogs.sun.com/robertlor/entry/user_level_dtrace_probes_in
Robert, Can you throw any light on this? Or do you have any further
comments on the docs?
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/dynamic-trace.html
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-12-02 13:31:32 | Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-12-02 09:00:07 | Open Season on v8.3 ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-12-02 19:38:46 | Re: GUC description cleanup |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-12-02 08:43:36 | Re: Dynamic Tracing docs |