Re: fatal error on 8.1 server

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fatal error on 8.1 server
Date: 2006-11-27 19:38:51
Message-ID: 1164656331.16182.64.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 13:36 -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Tony Caduto wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know what the exact version is but I am getting this:
> >>
> >> FATAL: database is not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss
> >> in database "postgres"
> >>
> >> How can I recover from this and why woud this happen to the postgres
> >> database? Has my server been hacked? there should be no inserts or
> >> anything going on.
> >>
> >
> > Stop the postmaster, start a standalone backend, and issue a
> > database-wide VACUUM on database postgres.
> >
> >
> Yep, I saw that in the docs, now I am just having problems finding a
> standalone backend, not sure what that means.

postgres.exe or possibly postmaster.exe I don't know how the windows
side does it.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2006-11-27 19:39:51 Re: IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary Key?
Previous Message Scott Ribe 2006-11-27 19:37:11 Re: IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary Key?