| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kaare Rasmussen <kaare(at)jasonic(dot)dk>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' |
| Date: | 2006-11-21 19:21:32 |
| Message-ID: | 1164136892.24113.110.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
>
> I know EnterpriseDB is trying to have PostgreSQL mentioned in all their
> articles, but I supposed becuase it is an article that includes all open
> source databases (or based on open source databases like EnterpriseDB),
> it wasn't possible.
Honestly, I applaud the EnterpriseDB PR machine, and there is no reason
they should have to provide a mention to PostgreSQL. If they choose to,
I thank them as a community member. If not, it is their product and I
wish them the best.
However what does need to stop is the false statement that EnterpriseDB
is Open Source.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-21 19:45:12 | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-21 19:19:31 | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | netsql | 2006-11-21 20:03:40 | advanced index (descending and table-presorted descending) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-11-21 19:15:26 | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent |