| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | stafford(at)marine(dot)rutgers(dot)edu |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' |
| Date: | 2006-11-20 22:07:57 |
| Message-ID: | 1164060477.32134.15.camel@dogma.v10.wvs |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 15:13 -0500, Wm.A.Stafford wrote:
> I hope the subject says it all. I'm porting an Oracle-centric
> application to PostgreSQL and the Oracle sql is full of the 'unique'
> qualifier. I'm assuming PostgreSQL does not support 'unique' since
> don't see a 'unique' anywhere in the PostgreSQL docs. Is there a
> substitute or a technique to get the same result?
>
You mean a UNIQUE index on a column?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/sql-createtable.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/sql-createindex.html
The postgresql docs are filled with the word "UNIQUE".
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rodrigo Gonzalez | 2006-11-20 22:46:21 | Re: More on unique vs distinct |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2006-11-20 22:01:47 | Re: PostgreSQL equivalent of the Oracale 'unique' qualifier |