Re: Nasty VACUUM/bgwriter/segmentation bug

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Nasty VACUUM/bgwriter/segmentation bug
Date: 2006-11-19 20:01:15
Message-ID: 1163966475.30491.29.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 11:28 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
> > Let's go with the easy fix. With regular 1GB segment size, having a few
> > empty files in the data directory isn't going to hurt anyone.
>
> No, but it will confuse DBAs ("What the heck are all these 0B files?"). Maybe
> we should add code to VACUUM to look for these empty file segments and unlink
> them if they haven't been touched in a while (say, a day?).

I don't buy this argument. A smart DBA isn't going to do any such thing.
If you go around deleting unknown files you deserve everything you get.
Especially if you are in the middle of a PostgreSQL cluster tree.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-11-19 20:03:24 Re: Nasty VACUUM/bgwriter/segmentation bug
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-11-19 19:28:14 Re: Nasty VACUUM/bgwriter/segmentation bug