| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SPF Record ... |
| Date: | 2006-11-18 21:09:54 |
| Message-ID: | 1163884194.22477.0.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> > O.k. and is OpenSPF the definitive source for information on it?
>
> I do not know who is the definite source.
>
> > Honestly, the whole thing sounds pretty pointless at least at this
> > juncture. I am not bashing the technology but I don't really see a
> > reason for it.
>
> Good! Then you'd agree, there's no harm in publishing our SPF
> records vis DNS and letting others use it.
My only argument would be *if* there is additional administrative
overhead. If not.. I a really don't care :). If Marc wants to use it,
have at it.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-11-18 21:19:43 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
| Previous Message | Dan Langille | 2006-11-18 21:01:45 | Re: SPF Record ... |