From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The support pages on postgresql.org |
Date: | 2006-11-09 18:23:36 |
Message-ID: | 1163096616.28784.83.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:04 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
> A couple questions about the North America support page
> on postgresql.org.
>
> * Is there any reason why Sun is not on the North America support
> page [1]. It seems from the Nov 2005 press release [2] that
> they do provide support. Did they stop doing this? If they
> still do, can we ask someone from Sun to get themselves added
> to this page.
Hmm... probably because they didn't ask :).
>
> * Fujitsu is listed in the Oceania page [3] and Asia page [5].
> Considering their large international presence -- they alone
> almost certainly have a bigger IT support staff in North
> America than all the organizations listed on the North
> America page[1] -- would it be reasonable to list them
> on all the continent's support pages?
I actually don't think Fujitsu (I could be wrong) supports PostgreSQL in
the US.
>
> * Does Red Hat or any of the other big Linux distributors
> provide postgresql support in North America? Could
> they be added to the North America support page[1]?
Red Hat will support it as part of their distribution. So we would have
to have a big caveat there.
> I ask mainly because if your average CxO reads the
> current North America support page he probably won't
> recognize anyone there.
Yet it doesn't stop them from calling them.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
> I realize the page just gets
> populated by companies who submit themselves using the
> from [4] - but it seems it'd make postgresql quite a bit
> more impressive to naive customers if they saw that support
> is available in North America from some of the big companies.
> If people agree, could someone from advocacy try to round up
> some of those big companies to submit themselves.
>
>
> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support_northamerica
> [2] http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2005-11/sunflash.20051117.1.xml
> [3] http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support_oceania
> [4] http://www.postgresql.org/support/newprof
> [5] http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support_asia
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-11-09 20:01:46 | Re: On what we want to support: infrastructure? |
Previous Message | Mike Ellsworth | 2006-11-09 18:11:36 | from Web 2.0 Conference |