From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Subject: | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |
Date: | 2006-11-06 19:12:32 |
Message-ID: | 1162840352.30200.105.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 13:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > At the moment we only allow 2 types of table. Approved core catalog
> > tables and user tables.
>
> > ISTM we need 3 types of tables, with the additional type being add-on
> > system functionality, such as adminpack,
>
> What? The adminpack module only creates functions.
AFAIK the namespace is the issue, not the type of object.
As I mentioned, we can add LWlock extensions but we don't have an
official home for other database objects.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Whidden | 2006-11-06 19:14:20 | Tsearch Index Size and GiST vs. GIN |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-06 18:57:57 | Re: cvs 'initdb' -- "vacuuming database template1 ... FATAL: could not identify a comparison function for type aclitem" |