From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bernd Helmle" <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation |
Date: | 2006-11-05 18:15:24 |
Message-ID: | 1162750525.3587.919.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't see why we should go out of our way to
> provide a bad substitute for pwd.
That argument is conclusive. Agreed.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-05 18:24:55 | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-05 17:01:54 | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-05 18:24:55 | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-05 17:01:54 | Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing |