| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
| Date: | 2004-03-05 21:48:58 |
| Message-ID: | 11624.1078523338@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> * With -i and virtual_host: bind to specified address(es) only.
> Can you bind one socket to more than one address?
Nope. That's why we have provisions to listen on more than one socket.
I think that was implemented for virtual_host, but it'd be necessary
anyway for dual IPv4/IPv6 support.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-03-05 22:06:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
| Previous Message | Dennis Haney | 2004-03-05 21:32:03 | Re: IN joining |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-03-05 22:06:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
| Previous Message | jearl | 2004-03-05 18:54:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-05 21:55:55 | Re: notice about costly ri checks (2) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-05 20:02:10 | Re: Updated version of contrib/xml (at last) |