| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extended protocol logging |
| Date: | 2006-11-01 11:18:17 |
| Message-ID: | 1162379898.3587.37.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> > These are logs from Beta 2.
>
> With what logging settings? log_duration has rather different behavior
> from what it used to do.
I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test program
in the protocol section, so interface designers know what will get
logged from various protocol sequences.
That way JDBC people and others can interpret what their own interfaces
should look like for 8.2
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-11-01 12:01:48 | Re: Extended protocol logging |
| Previous Message | tomas | 2006-11-01 09:50:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2006-11-01 12:01:48 | Re: Extended protocol logging |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-01 04:51:40 | Re: Extended protocol logging |