Re: access and security

From: Andrew Kelly <akelly(at)corisweb(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: access and security
Date: 2006-10-30 14:47:44
Message-ID: 1162219664.5364.10.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:36 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:34:34PM +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > please forgive a (likely) less than clever question.
> >
> > Are the barriers provided by pg_hba.conf enough from a security
> > standpoint, or is it best to put up some iptable rules duplicating the
> > restrictions?
>
> iptables covers the entire server, whereas pg_hba.conf cancontrol per
> database. Think of it as layers. If you know only two other machines
> will ever access this server, you can use iptables to enforce this.
> From those two machines, you than use pg_hba.conf to fine-tune the
> access controls.
>
> Have a nice day,

Thanks, Martijn, und danke Andreas.

This is what I figured; appreciate the confirmation.

Andy

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-30 15:14:09 Re: log_duration and JDBC V3 Preparded Statements
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-10-30 14:36:34 Re: access and security