Re: adminpack and pg_catalog

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
Date: 2006-10-22 15:23:02
Message-ID: 1161530582.4211.72.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 12:37 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> > If you change it you will make it useless as pgAdmin won't
> > necessarily find the functions it expects. You might as well just
> > remove it (which will almost certainly cause delays to pgAdmin - and
> > pgInstallers - release as I'll need to find time to put it all back
> > how it was).
>
> If pgAdmin is going to dictate what we do with adminpack, adminpack
> should rather be shipped with pgAdmin.

Admin tools are critical.

adminpack is being made available for any and all admin packages, so all
tools, including for example psql *could* be enhanced to use those.
Whether they do is up to them, but at least their life is potentially
easier.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-10-22 15:59:19 Re: xlogdump fixups and WAL log question.
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-10-22 15:18:45 Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8