Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL
Date: 2009-03-17 18:02:14
Message-ID: 11614.1237312934@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> [ use Solaris' version of getopt_long ]

The reason not to do that was discussed in this thread:

http://archives.postgresql.org//pgsql-patches/2008-02/msg00075.php

While Chuck is certainly free to build his local copy however he wants,
I don't think we're going to revert this change in the community
sources.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chuck McDevitt 2009-03-17 18:14:57 Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-17 16:54:08 Re: Problem with zero year