Re: BUG #18520: Different results when analyze a relation with UDT.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: 2467882606(at)qq(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18520: Different results when analyze a relation with UDT.
Date: 2024-06-24 14:57:51
Message-ID: 1161093.1719241071@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> When analyzing a relation with UDT, an error will be encountered if there is
> a join before the analyze stmts. Error message is "ERROR: missing support
> function 1(16386,16386) in opfamily 16392".

What your example shows is a buggy (very incomplete) operator class.
This is not a Postgres bug.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-06-24 15:17:04 Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-06-24 14:34:08 Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943