From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gandalf <gandalf(dot)me(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fast backup/restore |
Date: | 2006-10-16 18:32:41 |
Message-ID: | 1161023561.31645.51.camel@dogma.v10.wvs |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 16:29 +0530, Gandalf wrote:
> I am looking for a *fast* backup/restore tools for Postgres. I've
> found the current used tools pg_dump and pg_restore to be very slow on
> large databases (~30-40GB). Restore takes time in the tune of 6 hrs on
> a Linux, 4 proc, 32 G RAM machine which is not acceptable.
>
> I am using "pg_dump -Fc" to take backup. I understand binary
> compression adds to the time, but there are other databases (like DB2)
> which take much less time on similar data sizes.
>
> Are there faster tools available?
>
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/backup-online.html
With that backup system, you can backup with normal filesystem-level
tools (e.g. tar) while the database is online.
Make sure to backup the remaining active WAL segments. Those are
necessary for the backup to be complete. This step will be done
automatically in 8.2.
If your filesystem has snapshot capability, you have nothing to worry
about. Just snapshot the fs and backup the data directory plus any WAL
segments and tablespaces.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexandre Arruda | 2006-10-16 18:39:41 | pg_locks: who is locking ? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-16 18:27:26 | Re: RES: Dates rejected |