Re: partition -> partitioned

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partition -> partitioned
Date: 2018-06-19 08:51:05
Message-ID: 115a0fb8-d640-9f9e-5b38-320b2aa578a7@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/05/17 11:48, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/05/17 11:40, David Rowley wrote:
>> On 17 May 2018 at 13:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> Commit 499be013de6 used 'partition' where it really meant 'partitioned' in
>>> a few places including in a variable name. For example, what almost all
>>> places call 'partitioned_rels', make_partition_pruneinfo called
>>> 'partition_rels'.
>>>
>>> Attached a patch to make that uniform to avoid confusion.
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>
> Thanks for taking a look at it.

Did this perhaps get forgotten?

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-06-19 09:02:22 Re: partition -> partitioned
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-06-19 08:43:38 Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.