From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ioannis Theoharis <theohari(at)ics(dot)forth(dot)gr> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Transitive Closure and 'pg_inherits' |
Date: | 2005-04-03 17:13:09 |
Message-ID: | 11594.1112548389@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Ioannis Theoharis <theohari(at)ics(dot)forth(dot)gr> writes:
> My question is whether the way, in wich postgresql do this task, is a
> transitive closure on table 'pg_inherits' or there is a better approach
> implemented (like numbering scheme techniques etc.) ?
It's a transitive closure, and not a very bright one at that; see
find_all_inheritors(), find_inheritance_children(), and particularly
the comments to the latter. However, we've not heard reports indicating
that this is a serious bottleneck in any real-world situation, so
no one has spent time to improve it. (I'd expect the per-table planning
costs to vastly outweigh the cost of finding those tables, anyway.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-04 00:41:51 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Previous Message | Ioannis Theoharis | 2005-04-03 17:02:27 | Recursive SQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-04 00:59:21 | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
Previous Message | Ioannis Theoharis | 2005-04-03 17:02:27 | Recursive SQL |