| From: | Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Charles Sprickman <spork(at)bway(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: recommended benchmarks |
| Date: | 2006-09-22 19:08:05 |
| Message-ID: | 1158952085.11550.0.camel@dba5.int.libertyrms.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 13:14 -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I still have an dual dual-core opteron box with a 3Ware 9550SX-12 sitting
> here and I need to start getting it ready for production. I also have to
> send back one processor since we were mistakenly sent two. Before I do
> that, I would like to record some stats for posterity and post to the list
> so that others can see how this particular hardware performs.
>
> It looks to be more than adequate for our needs...
>
> What are the standard benchmarks that people here use for comparison
> purposes? I know all benchmarks are flawed in some way, but I'd at least
> like to measure with the same tools that folks here generally use to get a
> ballpark figure.
Check out the OSDL stuff.
http://www.osdl.org/lab_activities/kernel_testing/osdl_database_test_suite/
Brad.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2006-09-22 20:34:04 | Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark" |
| Previous Message | Charles Sprickman | 2006-09-22 17:14:16 | recommended benchmarks |