| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: setseed() doc |
| Date: | 2006-09-20 15:10:15 |
| Message-ID: | 1158765015.5151.1.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 15:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICT it's just junk. It happens to be the input times
> MAX_RANDOM_VALUE, but what use is that? I wonder if we shouldn't
> change the function to return VOID
I agree. Given how soon we want to get an 8.2 beta out the door, perhaps
this change would be best postponed to 8.3 (unless there's another
outstanding 8.2 patch that requires initdb?).
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-09-20 15:46:24 | Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2 |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-09-20 15:05:35 | Re: pdfs of the conference |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-20 15:47:39 | Re: [HACKERS] setseed() doc |
| Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2006-09-20 14:50:24 | Re: Dynamic linking on AIX |