Re: inner join is much faster! is that right?

From: Chris Mair <chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org>
To: James Im <im-james(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inner join is much faster! is that right?
Date: 2006-09-19 12:29:37
Message-ID: 1158668977.15510.19.camel@ultra.home.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql


> I really thought that Postgresql would rewrite a query from
>
> select *
> from file a, file_tag b, tag c
> where a.id_file=b.id_file and b.id_tag=c.id_tag and a.id_file=10000001000000
>
> to something like:
>
> select *
> from (file a inner join file_tag b on (a.id_file=b.id_file)) inner join
> tag c on (b.id_tag=c.id_tag)
> where a.id_file=10000001000000

These shouldn't be other than two ways to express the same (inner)
join.

Your timings seem to suggest that in the first case PG computes
the whole join between 3 tables and only then applies the filter
in a.

Can you send the outputs of "explain <query>" for these two and
let us know what version of PG this is?

Bye, Chris.

--

Chris Mair
http://www.1006.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Im 2006-09-19 13:44:13 Re: inner join is much faster! is that right?
Previous Message Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha 2006-09-19 12:11:51 Borland Database Engine assumes Varchar(255) as Memo