Re: parallel restore

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-01-06 21:32:22
Message-ID: 11569.1231277542@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> i'm using:
>> pg_restore -f mic.backup -Fc -v -m5

> Strange. Maybe the server log will show activity?

There's no connection info, so that should just print to stdout, and
probably there is no point in any parallelism. I'm guessing the -m
switch invokes code that fails to deal with this case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-06 21:40:58 Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-06 21:25:30 Re: Is it really such a great idea for spi.h to include the world?