Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
Date: 2006-08-28 22:36:08
Message-ID: 1156804568.10490.36.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 17:34, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > I'm wondering if the source code is available.
>
> http://www.heise.de/ct/dbcontest/teilnehmer.shtml
>
> > My guess is it was full of MySQLisms and the postgresql "port" was
> > written without indexes, no transactions, and relied on running
> > dozens of queries that postgresql could have more efficiently done in
> > one query or in one transaction at least.
>
> Your guess is wrong.

Yes, I see that now. I thought it was one version of the same app
pointed at different DBs.

I see now that it's not. See my most recent post...

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-28 23:21:57 Re: Atomicity?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2006-08-28 22:34:52 Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article