Re: optimising UNION performance

From: Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: optimising UNION performance
Date: 2006-08-28 22:17:08
Message-ID: 1156803428.18132.23.camel@zorro.isa-geek.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

This is a little strange - my response to this post apparently got lost
in the net?? I haven't received it back through the list nor it's
visible in the archieve. Yet, my exim logfile contains entry indicating
'delivery complited'???

But to the point.

All the EXPLAIN ANALISE I did on posggres v8.1.4 - plain *.deb binary
install from debian network repository.

So if version v8.1 was expected to behave any differently, it doesn't.
But may be the reduction improvement are in some pre-8.2 versions?

-R

On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 10:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alban Hertroys <alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl> writes:
> > There's practically no difference between SELECT 1 FROM ... and SELECT *
> > FROM ...; the only added costs (AFAIK) are for actually fetching the
> > column values and such. Pretty cheap operations.
>
> You're both glossing over exactly the wrong thing, particularly seeing
> that Rafal appears to be using 8.0 or older which hasn't got 8.1's
> significant reductions in targetlist evaluation costs.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
--
-R

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2006-08-28 22:27:16 Re: Precision of data types and functions
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2006-08-28 22:06:54 Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article