Re: Re: Re: Refresh Publication takes hours and doesn´t finish

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabrizio(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: PegoraroF10 <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Refresh Publication takes hours and doesn´t finish
Date: 2019-05-21 18:27:33
Message-ID: 11566.1558463253@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabrizio(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> Em ter, 21 de mai de 2019 às 14:41, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> escreveu:
>> It's a view, not a table, so I don't think you need
>> allow_system_table_mods. A quick test here says that being
>> superuser is enough to do a CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW on it.

> Interesting, I tried the following commands and got error:

Oh, huh, this is something that changed recently in HEAD ---
since commit 2d7d946cd, stuff created by system_views.sql
is not protected as though it were a system catalog.

So in released versions, yes you need allow_system_table_mods=on.
Sorry for the misinformation.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Shepard 2019-05-21 18:28:58 Re: Bulk inserts into two (related) tables
Previous Message Will Hartung 2019-05-21 18:27:10 Re: Bulk inserts into two (related) tables

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-21 18:33:50 Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2019-05-21 18:19:10 Re: describe working as intended?