Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The dbname patch is now done. If nobody objects to the format
> ("[db:yourdbname]") I'll submit it - I did it that way to make it fairly
> easy to split a log file based on it, although you would have to be
> careful with multiline log entries such as query strings.
I'd tend to just put the dbname in a known column, and not bother with
the decoration --- decoration adds up fast when it's on every log line,
and I don't think it helps make the log more parseable. Compare what we
do with timestamps and pids.
regards, tom lane