Re: [PATCHES] WIP archive_timeout patch

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WIP archive_timeout patch
Date: 2006-08-18 08:14:47
Message-ID: 1155888887.2591.16.camel@holly
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 19:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> Revised patch enclosed, now believed to be production ready. This
> >> implements regular log switching using the archive_timeout GUC.
>
> > Further patch enclosed implementing these changes plus the record type
> > version of pg_xlogfile_name_offset()
>
> Applied with minor changes --- it seemed better to me to put tracking of
> the last xlog switch time directly into xlog.c, instead of having the
> bgwriter code try to determine whether a switch had happened recently.

Code location: sure.

> I noticed a minor annoyance while testing: when the system is completely
> idle, you get a forced segment switch every checkpoint_timeout seconds,
> even though there is nothing useful to log. The checkpoint code is
> smart enough not to do a checkpoint if nothing has happened since the
> last one, and the xlog switch code is smart enough not to do a switch
> if nothing has happened since the last one ... but they aren't talking
> to each other and so each one's change looks like "something happened"
> to the other one. I'm not sure how much trouble it's worth taking to
> prevent this scenario, though. If you can't afford a WAL file switch
> every five minutes, you probably shouldn't be using archive_timeout
> anyway ...

I noticed that minor annoyance and understood that I had fixed it before
submitting. That was the reason for putting the code in bgwriter to
check whether the pointer had moved before attempting the switch...
perhaps that functionality has been removed?

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD 2006-08-18 08:20:47 Re: [PATCHES] WIP archive_timeout patch
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-08-18 07:29:39 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD 2006-08-18 08:20:47 Re: [PATCHES] WIP archive_timeout patch
Previous Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2006-08-18 02:31:59 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes