From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] selecting large result sets in psql using |
Date: | 2006-08-17 07:20:30 |
Message-ID: | 1155799230.2649.492.camel@holly |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 03:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > BTW, \u seems not to have any mnemonic value whatsoever ... isn't
> > > there some other name we could use?
> >
> > Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, threading
> > doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this refers to at
> > all.
>
> I see the original posting here:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-07/msg00287.php
>
> but I don't remember seeing this posting at all, and it isn't saved in
> my mailbox either. Strange.
FWIW I saw it.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Zhang | 2006-08-17 07:36:01 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-17 07:14:49 | Re: [HACKERS] selecting large result sets in psql using |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Zhang | 2006-08-17 07:36:01 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: bitmap indexes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-17 07:14:49 | Re: [HACKERS] selecting large result sets in psql using |