| From: | Steve Poe <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and |
| Date: | 2006-08-08 04:13:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1155010416.17773.1.camel@amd64-gentoo-laptop |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Luke,
Here are the results of two runs of 16GB file tests on XFS.
scsi disc array
xfs ,16G,81024,99,153016,24,73422,10,82092,97,243210,17,1043.1,0,16,3172,7,+++++,+++,2957,9,3197,10,+++++,+++,2484,8
scsi disc array
xfs ,16G,83320,99,155641,25,73662,10,81756,96,243352,18,1029.1,0,16,3119,10,+++++,+++,2789,7,3263,11,+++++,+++,2014,6
Thanks.
Steve
> Can you run bonnie++ version 1.03a on the machine and report the results
> here?
>
> It could be OK if you have the latest Linux driver for cciss, someone has
> reported good results to this list with the latest, bleeding edge version of
> Linux (2.6.17).
>
> - Luke
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Turner | 2006-08-08 06:33:39 | Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good enough |
| Previous Message | Steve Poe | 2006-08-08 02:28:46 | Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and |