Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and

From: Steve Poe <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Date: 2006-08-08 04:13:36
Message-ID: 1155010416.17773.1.camel@amd64-gentoo-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Luke,

Here are the results of two runs of 16GB file tests on XFS.

scsi disc array
xfs ,16G,81024,99,153016,24,73422,10,82092,97,243210,17,1043.1,0,16,3172,7,+++++,+++,2957,9,3197,10,+++++,+++,2484,8
scsi disc array
xfs ,16G,83320,99,155641,25,73662,10,81756,96,243352,18,1029.1,0,16,3119,10,+++++,+++,2789,7,3263,11,+++++,+++,2014,6

Thanks.

Steve

> Can you run bonnie++ version 1.03a on the machine and report the results
> here?
>
> It could be OK if you have the latest Linux driver for cciss, someone has
> reported good results to this list with the latest, bleeding edge version of
> Linux (2.6.17).
>
> - Luke
>

>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Turner 2006-08-08 06:33:39 Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good enough
Previous Message Steve Poe 2006-08-08 02:28:46 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and