From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical |
Date: | 2006-08-07 20:22:17 |
Message-ID: | 1154982136.20252.35.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 15:18, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >
> > Oh, I see where you were headed.
> >
> > I've found a bit here and there googling about for multiplex and tar,
> > and found an IO:Multiplex module for perl.
> >
> > I don't see why someone couldn't make use of it to create some kind of
> > system where you'd do:
> >
> > pg_dump dbname | perl mulitiplexscript device1,device2,device3,devicen
> >
> > No need for postgresql to support it directly. Restoring would likewise
> > just be a reverse operation.
>
> Interesting. Many thanks. Scary though that it hasn't been touched
> in 30 months.
>
> With multiple SCSI cards, each with it's own tape drive, this
> immensely speeds up the backup operation.
Yeah, I read the description, and I think it's just a fancy name for
tee. sigh. Not REAL multiplexing, but stream duplication.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2006-08-07 21:09:54 | Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2006-08-07 20:18:09 | Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical |