From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
Date: | 2006-08-04 20:35:09 |
Message-ID: | 1154723709.2495.14.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 10:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Docs and regression tests attached.
>
> I've applied the regression tests (with a few additions), but I'm
> feeling dissatisfied with this approach to documenting VALUES.
> It seems to be mostly missing the point about VALUES being usable
> whereever SELECT is. I'm not at all sure what I'd do instead though.
> Should we give VALUES its own reference page? That doesn't quite
> seem helpful either. cc'ing to pgsql-docs for ideas.
The DB2 manual does exactly that and is not any clearer as a result,
even if it is fully normalised.
If we did that we'd need to emphasise that VALUES is more of a clause
than a new command.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrzej B.J.Schulz | 2006-08-09 05:23:25 | unsubscribe |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-04 07:02:09 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-08-04 20:38:04 | Re: WIP archive_timeout patch |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-08-04 20:32:14 | Re: 8.2 features status |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-08-04 20:38:04 | Re: WIP archive_timeout patch |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-04 19:42:02 | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |