Re:

No, this is a test server used for regression testing. Relatively
small (hundreds of GB) and quiet (dozen connections) in the Postgres
universe.

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:31 -0400, Chris Hoover wrote:
> Just curious, is this a production server? Also, how large is the
> total cluster on disk?
>
> On 8/3/06, Ian Westmacott <ianw(at)intellivid(dot)com> wrote:
> is that all?
>
> psql -l | grep 'rows)'
> (2016 rows)
>
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 21:15 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 01:33:35PM -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > > I'm at a client who's an ASP; they've written their app
> such that each
> > > customer gets their own database. Rigth now they're at
> nearly 200
> > > databases, and were thinking that they "must be the
> largest PostgreSQL
> > > install in the world". :) After taking them down a notch
> or two, I
> > > started wondering how many sites could beat 200 databases
> in a single
> > > cluster. I'm sure there's any number that can, though 200
> databases in a
> > > cluster certainly isn't mainstream.
> >
> > cassarossa:~> psql -h sql -l | grep 'rows)'
> > (137 rows)
> >
> > That's our measly student society. :-)
> >
> > /* Steinar */
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>