Re: Keeping track of buildfarm animals' personality

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Keeping track of buildfarm animals' personality
Date: 2024-06-11 20:59:14
Message-ID: 1154437.1718139554@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On second thoughts, perhaps we always want to capture the uname
> version,

+1. Is there any reason not to capture "uname -a"? The
configure-based animals are effectively doing that already.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2024-06-11 21:04:29 Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-06-11 20:46:06 Re: Keeping track of buildfarm animals' personality