From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA |
Date: | 2014-12-09 14:59:24 |
Message-ID: | 1154.1418137164@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> ISTM that REINDEX is not consistent with VACUUM, ANALYZE or CLUSTER in
> the way it issues NOTICE messages.
> I'm inclined to simply remove the NOTICE messages, except when a
> REINDEX ... VERBOSE is requested.
My recollection is that those other commands do issue messages always,
but at some DEBUGn log level when not VERBOSE. Ideally REINDEX would
adopt that same behavior.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sawada Masahiko | 2014-12-09 15:34:21 | Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-12-09 14:56:01 | Re: alter user set local_preload_libraries. |