Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Date: 2014-12-09 14:59:24
Message-ID: 1154.1418137164@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> ISTM that REINDEX is not consistent with VACUUM, ANALYZE or CLUSTER in
> the way it issues NOTICE messages.

> I'm inclined to simply remove the NOTICE messages, except when a
> REINDEX ... VERBOSE is requested.

My recollection is that those other commands do issue messages always,
but at some DEBUGn log level when not VERBOSE. Ideally REINDEX would
adopt that same behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sawada Masahiko 2014-12-09 15:34:21 Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-12-09 14:56:01 Re: alter user set local_preload_libraries.