Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89)
Date: 2005-10-26 21:06:02
Message-ID: 11535.1130360762@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:48:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sounds that way.

> Is this something that should be logged better than it is?

We don't even know what it is yet, so that question seems a bit premature.

> Is there any value in trying to save the index/table that's busted?

It'd probably be worth making a copy for forensic purposes before you
REINDEX it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-26 21:06:35 Re: slower merge join on sorted data chosen over
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-26 21:03:41 Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89)