From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A couple thoughts about btree fillfactor |
Date: | 2006-07-10 17:31:17 |
Message-ID: | 1152552677.4006.6.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 2006-07-10 kell 12:36, kirjutas Tom Lane:
> 3. What should the minimum fillfactor be? The patch as submitted
> set the minimum to 50% for all relation types. I'm inclined to
> think we should allow much lower fillfactors, maybe down to 10%.
> A really low fillfactor could be a good idea in a heavily updated
> table --- at least, I don't think we have any evidence to prove
> that it's not sane to want a fillfactor below 50%.
Sure 50% is way too big as an lower limit. We may even want to have
pages that have only 1 tuple in heavy update cases.
So perhaps we should set the minimum to 1% or even 0.1% and apply
similar logic you suggested for btree pages above, that is stop adding
new ones when the threasold is reached.
> Comments?
--
----------------
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia
Skype me: callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2006-07-10 17:34:48 | Warm-Standby using WAL archiving / Seperate pg_restorelog application |
Previous Message | mark | 2006-07-10 17:09:26 | Re: A couple thoughts about btree fillfactor |