| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeremy Jongsma <jeremy(at)jongsma(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Strange difference in query execution time |
| Date: | 2004-08-27 18:25:05 |
| Message-ID: | 1151.1093631105@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jeremy Jongsma <jeremy(at)jongsma(dot)org> writes:
> My questions are:
> 1) How can #3 take 30 times as long as #2, given that in my databse they
> have the exact same number of rows returned and are drawn from the exact
> same tables?
> 2) How is it possible for #3, a subset of #1 with a very simple WHERE
> clause, to take three times longer than #1 to execute?
> I can provide table definitions if needed.
What would be more useful is EXPLAIN ANALYZE output (and you have
ANALYZEd all the underlying tables, no?). This is a bit off topic
for pgsql-general though, please take it to pgsql-performance.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | borajetta | 2004-08-27 18:40:53 | Which Order Vacuum Full Analyze Cluster Reindex? |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2004-08-27 18:13:03 | Re: performance of IN (subquery) |