From: | John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS] |
Date: | 2006-06-15 01:27:43 |
Message-ID: | 1150334863.13443.3.camel@barney.geeknet.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 08:48 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> > >>> (The fact that archives.p.o can't properly link between threads that
> > >>> cross month boundaries is pretty annoying...)
> > >>
> > >> Indeed, I was just annoyed by that (again) a few minutes ago. Anyone
> > >> on -www have an idea how to fix it?
> > >
> > > I am also having problems that the date sorting often has a few entries
> > > at the end of out of order. I think that needs to be fixed too.
> >
> > please provide a sample of what you are talking about ... :)
>
> Sure, search for "misnomer" and sorty by date. Look at the last page.
> You will see 2005 entries that should have appeared earlier.
>
Thats due to a bug in the search engine, not the archives themselves.
... John
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-06-15 01:34:08 | Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS] |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-06-15 00:17:54 | Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-06-15 01:34:08 | Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS] |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-06-13 19:20:57 | Re: Fwd: borg.postgresql.org daily run output |